It provides a better user experience and usability. Overall, Blaze Meter is more advanced than Apache JMeter. It is not beginner-friendly and requires a lot of programming expertise for more complex text scenarios. You can’t record the test scenario more than once, and you cannot edit them either. There are no HTML reports for performance tests. The interface is outdated, and it is not easy to use or install. Our user experience overall was very poor. We could use it to assess websites’ performance and conduct stress testing. It is a simple, easy-to-use tool for evaluating the performance and load of applications. We also evaluated the Apache JMeter tool for load and performance testing. Another feature that needs improvement is the multi-protocol support for desktop-based apps. The Chrome extension usability is somewhat poor, and the script creations feature could be improved. I need to do load testing of a website with 100 concurrent user using Jmeter I have created test plan Like this. Regarding price, BlazeMeter is affordable. If you already have Apache JMeter, the BlazeMeter can complement functionality gaps. What we liked most about BlazeMeter was that it helps identify performance issues that may be introduced via new functionalities.Ĭompatibility with Apache JMeter is also a big advantage. It also integrates smoothly into our CICD pipeline. It is easy to use and requires no special expertise. One of the best features was the GUI because it allows you to load scripts. We evaluated BlazeMeter to load testing applications - mostly core business applications and customer-facing.
It unifies functional and performance testing, enabling users to monitor and test public and private APIs. Blazemeter is a continuous testing platform that provides scriptless test automation.
0 kommentar(er)
